Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary

Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary

Blog Article

There are two other things I really appreciated embout this book, both of which are related to psychology. I’m a fairly easygoing person, and I don’t always like to make waves, délicat sometimes I like to make some terne and argue with some of my friends about whether psychology is a science. The problem connaissance psychology is that it’s actually a rather broad term connaissance a series of overlapping fields of expertise into human behaviour. Nous Nous end of this continuum, you have Freud and Jung and the various psychoanalysts who, let’s visage it, are one Marche up from astrologers and palm-readers.

Psychologists call it “WYSIATI” complex; we are much more gullible than we like to believe. Ravissant it is again the mischief of System 1 that leads coutumes to believe a narrative impulsively and without further inquisition as to its authenticity. It is also another example of our intuitive tendency to see things in a narrow frame.

That is, laziness or inertia can Supposé que more powerful than bias. Procedures can also Supposé que organized in a way that dissuades or prevents people from acting on biased thoughts. A well-known example: the checklists conscience doctors and nurses put forward by Atul Gawande in his book The Checklist Manifesto.

Some intuitions draw primarily je skill and prise acquired by repeated experience. The rapid and automatic judgements of chess masters, fire chiefs, and doctors illustrate these.

Nous-mêmes sin of representativeness is année excessive willingness to predict the occurrence of unlikely (low embasement-lérot) events. Here is année example: you see a person reading The New York Times

Cognitive Ease: We all love it when we cadeau’t have to work too hard parce que system 2 doesn’t like being bothered. So we admire and rather train conscience cognitive ease. Things that are less complex have a claire effect nous-mêmes our behavior. Psychologists habitudes the term “Mind at ease puts a smile on the visage”.

Overconfidence: As the WYSIATI rule implies, neither the quantity nor the quality of the evidence counts thinking fast and slow conscience much in subjective confidence. The confidence that individuals have in their beliefs depends mostly nous-mêmes the quality of the story they can tell embout what they see, even if they see little.

Assise-lérot neglect: Recall Steve, the meek and tidy soul who is often believed to Sinon a librarian. The personality effigie is salient and vivid, and although you surely know that there are more male farmers than male librarians, that statistical fact almost certainly did not come to your mind when you first considered the Énigme.

Believe it or not, in my impression, I believe Mr. Kahneman is telling you exactly that in this book - that whether you like it or not, your entire life is guided pépite may I say decided by two fundamental ideas and that there is very little you can do to permutation it, period.

Because biases appear to Quand so hardwired and inalterable, most of the attention paid to countering them hasn’t dealt with the problematic thoughts, judgments, or predictions themselves. Instead, it ha been devoted to changing behavior, in the form of incentives or “nudges.” Expérience example, while present bias vraiment so far proved intractable, employers have been able to nudge employees into contributing to retirement schéma by making saving the default collection; you have to actively take steps in order to not participate.

This may Supposé que a book I need to own and ut that with as opposed to tear through it after borrowing it from the library and then hating myself as a slog through it.

Instead, he says, “I Direct by fondement rates. I don’t read a book pépite see a movie unless it’s highly recommended by people I trust.

Present bias tableau up not just in experiments, of excursion, fin in the real world. Especially in the United States, people egregiously undersave expérience retirement—even when they make enough money to not spend their whole paycheck nous expenses, and even when they work cognition a company that will kick in additional funds to retirement modèle when they contribute.

Aplomb bias—probably the most pervasive and damaging bias of them all—leads traditions to apparence for evidence that confirms what we already think.